Quantcast
Channel: Spode History
Viewing all 87 articles
Browse latest View live

Spode and 'an accomplished violinist'

$
0
0
Violin c1780
So what has a violinist got to do with Spode? Quite a lot! Read on...

In his history* of the Adams potting family, Percy Adams wrote:

'When any festivities were held at the Bank House [the Adams' home in Bagnall, Staffordshire], Josiah Spode of Stoke (afterwards the famous potter) would always be invited to be one of the musicians, as he was an accomplished violinist. The two succeeding generations of the Adams and Spode families were intimate friends.'
Josiah Spode I, National Portrait Gallery
The particular Josiah Spode mentioned by Adams in the above extract is the one we now know as Josiah Spode I (1733-1797). In his lifetime the numbers at the end of the names were not used to differentiate between the Spodes. But now it helps us to know who was who of the many Josiah Spodes. In the Spodes' lifetime they would use a suffix of Elder or Younger, for example.
'Festivities' and violinist
Stoke to Bagnall - a couple of hours walk each way

How young Spode I made his way from Stoke, where he lived, to Bagnall, to play his violin at the 'festivities', we do not know. But most likely on foot or perhaps hitching a ride on a cart.
Bagnall in its Staffordshire Moorlands setting

Peter Roden** says:

'No one seems to have attached any significance to this talent in relation to his [Josiah Spode I] other obvious talent in the pottery industry.

Learning to play the violin is not something that one often learns in later life, and in Spode’s case, the suggestion [from Adams' writing] is that he had developed a local reputation as a violinist before he became famous as a potter. Is it not relevant to consider who might have taught him - after all, having access to violins is not something that one normally associates with eighteenth century paupers?

Whilst we are never likely to know who actually taught him, or gave him his first access to a musical instrument, we can note that (a) it would have been someone cultured, and (b) it is possible that his musical abilities may have provided his initial introduction to influential potters in his childhood.'

Peter Roden's research, then, raises intriguing questions about the early life and range of skills of the famous potter and founder of the Spode company. It is also recorded elsewhere that Spode I with his violin was for hire and played for money.

I sometimes feel that, born into poverty and the 'man of the family' from the age of 6, he was determined never again to be poor. From a young age he worked hard in the fledgling pottery industry, made money from his accomplished violin playing (you could say he had another  string to his bow!), married Ellen Finley, a woman running her own successful little haberdashery business, and juggled mortgages and pottery partnerships to be financially safe. It wasn't until he was in his forties, in 1776, that he was able to buy his own factory with his son Josiah Spode II. It would seem he had backup plans if anything drastically failed and was determined to be financially sound.
Detail of an haberdasher's trade card (London)
So there we have it, Josiah Spode I not just a master potter but also 'an accomplished violinist'.
__________
* 'A history of the Adams family of North Staffordshire, & of their connection with the development of the potteries, with numerous pedigree charts & notes on allied families' by P. L. Adams.

**This blogpost is based on detailed research by Peter Roden. The subject has always fascinated me and it is wonderful to find out more about the founder of the Spode company from this research. As ever, I thank Peter for sharing his decades of Spode family research with me. I couldn't do this blog without his work. I am in awe of the details and new Spode family (and Spode company) history he discovered over the years.

For more information enjoy consulting:

'Josiah Spode (1733-1797): his formative influences and the various Potworks associated with him' is available to consult at the Spode archive. The publisher's website, the Northern Ceramic Society, can be found by clicking NCS. Click here for my booklist with more details about Roden's publications.

Spode, a lorry and four cups

$
0
0

This photo was taken in 1959 at the Spode factory in Stoke-on-Trent.

It illustrates something very special. But what's the story behind the photograph?

In 1959 the Spode company was owned by the Copeland family operating as W. T. Copeland & Sons Ltd.

In the photo you can see what was then a modern vehicle to be proud of. It is smartly painted in the Spode livery.

The same typeface was also used as part of Spode backstamps of the period as well as on printed material, such as the in-house magazine the 'Spode Saga'.

Detail of lorry livery
Backstamp c1960
Cover, 'Spode Saga'
Catalogue page 1959
Also in the photo is a young man who I believe would be the driver but sadly I have not found his name.
Lorry driver
But look, there's more. Look under the wheels.

This is a publicity stunt!

The lorry is balanced on four bone china cups. This is pottery showmanship at its best - showcasing the strength of Spode's bone china.

Spode bone china cups under the wheels
Bone china is a Big Thing in the Staffordshire pottery industry.

The qualities of bone china are:
  • whiteness
  • translucency
  • strength
  • resonance
Its manufacturing and design quality was hugely important to the top pottery manufacturers, and particularly to Spode, who laid claim to its invention and/or perfection in about 1799/1800. It is this bone china which took the Spode company to greatness in the early 1800s overtaking rivals who could not compete with the quality of this new product.
Coffee cup, pattern 2812 c1820
Looking inside the cup showing translucency
The photos above show a bone china coffee cup in pattern 2182 of about 1820. You can see the whiteness, the quality of both shape and pattern design, and the translucency. 

So... in this marketing gimmick, what better way to show the strength of the then current Spode bone china than to balance something heavy on the product for a dramatic statement?

The lorry on four cups was the result. I love it!

I was lucky, whilst curator of the Spode museum, to have Robert Copeland (1925-2010) as my Spode mentor and colleague sharing his vast knowledge of the company history with me. At various times Robert was a partner in the firm and director as well as Historical Consultant. Conversations with him, whether formal or over a cuppa or lunch were always fascinating, often very amusing (we had the same sense of humour), and I used to scribble notes down, many of which are now preserved in the Spode archive.

I mention this because, of course, Robert was full of information about the 'lorry on four cups' event as he was there at the time and instrumental in developing the idea.
The author & Robert, deep in ceramic conversation 1998
He told me that for this Spode 'show of strength' a new area of nice smooth roadway was prepared on the factory site. After the publicity photographs had been taken and the lorry removed Robert recalled, with a giggle, that the cups had sunk into the new soft roadway and couldn't easily be retrieved!
Catalogue page bone china 1959
The 1959 catalogue page from a bone china catalogue shows the style of ware available at the time. The cup shape might even be that used in the lorry stunt.

Spode and the Royal Pavilion or how to 'accessorize' your pots (Part 1)

$
0
0
The duc d’Orléans Chinese vase early 18thC

Antique Chinese Vases? Let's Make Them into Oil Lamps!

The Royal Pavilion, Brighton, holds some remarkable objects. As 'the seaside pleasure palace for HM King George IV', it was decorated and furnished with the most amazing and exuberant objects of all sorts, including ceramics. Many items were specially commissioned. And many other objects, which most people would have swooned over in their original state, were altered, augmented and/or enlarged.

Spode (the pottery manufacturer), under Josiah Spode II, played an important part in the production of some of these magnificent and large objects. Unfortunately Josiah Spode II's contributions rarely gets a mention... hence this blogpost.
Spode II portrait painted on a Spode ceramic plaque
Josiah Spode II had his pottery manufactory in Stoke and a fashionable 'warehouse' in London. He was skilled in all aspects of ceramic manufacture, a true Master Potter. He was also brilliant at marketing his products and supplied the well-to-do from royalty downwards. He was to become Potter to the King but prior to that had already been appointed 'Potter and English Porcelain Manufacturer to His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales'. This took place in 1806 when the Prince had visited the Spode manufactory in Stoke and had been suitably impressed.

So, in Part 1 of this story of Spode and the Royal Pavilion, I'll show you the metamorphosis from grand vase to magnificent oil lamp.

It all begins in 1817 when 3 antique Chinese porcelain vases, believed to date from the early 1700s, were purchased in Paris for the Prince Regent. They had belonged to Philippe II (1674-1723), duc d’Orléans, Regent of France (1715-1723), and included his coat of arms. 

It was not sufficient that 3 beautiful antique Chinese porcelain vases (top photo), each about 100cm (about 3ft) high, were now destined for the palace but somebody had the thought 'let's make them into enormous, elaborate oil lamps'. 
Vase with added gilded bronze base and handles
Two men in particular, famous and skilled in their fields, were commissioned to collaborate and carry out the necessary work. Benjamin Vulliamy* (later Clockmaker to the King) was to make the gilded bronze adornments and Josiah Spode II (later Potter to the King) was to make extra, almost architectural, matching porcelain parts. I have not seen these items 'in the flesh' and the ceramic parts may be bone china or stone china - both ceramic bodies were early 19th century inventions and/or developments of Josiah Spode II. Some of the Spode additions for the Brighton Pavilion interiors are definitely stone china and are backstamped (marked) as such. In some contemporary records** they are referred to as 'British China'.

How were the simple vases converted into huge, elaborate oil lamps?

I find it's easier to look at the changes in stages (although this is probably not the order they were made in).

Handles & Foot:
Let's add handles and a foot. Plain and simple? No, let's go really fashionably fancy.

The handles (below) are elegant, swooping, winged dragons in gilded bronze. Plus a robust foot (above) also in gilded bronze. This work was by Vulliamy.
Handle detail
Additions of Handles, Foot & Light Bowl
Light Bowl:
These vases are going to be working oil lamps, so some sort of light fitting is required. In the photo above you can now see that a 'light bowl' has been added to the top of the vase and more beautiful gilded bronze fittings. In the Spode archive this light bowl is recorded as the 'Orleans Light Bowl & Foot'. I always wondered where the Orleans name came from... now I know, as it was to be fitted atop the duc d'Orleans old vases.

The image below shows 'Orleans Light Bowl & Foot' with its manufacturing instructions from a shape book of c1820. These include the note 'NB The Bowl is made of a Mould and the Foot & Neck are Thrown'. The majority of the pieces in the Spode shape books of this period are for items solely made by throwing hence the note. The technical details included are for the Thrower (measurements on the left-hand page) and for the Turner (measurements on the right-hand page).

I have added an image of the light bowl on the top of the vase overlaid on the shape book entry so you can see how the actual pieces fitted onto the lamps. The red oval red circle highlights the annotation 'for the King'. Nice!
Orleans Light Bowl & Foot
Base:
So, together with their conversion to lamps, was this enough extra ornamentation to these Chinese vases? Of course not. Let's make them taller, really tall!

A base was designed and, again, the Spode pottery manufactory made the ceramic panels and Vulliamy the gilded bronze. The Spode panels were handpainted and gilded following the Chinese style of the original vase. It's technically difficult to make ceramics absolutely flat and the Spode company always excelled at this. You can find out a bit more about this elsewhere on this blog - click HERE>
The rather wonderful lamp base
What did the finished oil lamps look like? Magnificent!
What this story does not tell is the technical side of things, the communication between the Spode factory in Stoke and the Spode London business, communication with Vulliamy and other experts, and with the agents of the HM King George IV. The risk of damage to the original vases and the making of the new bits must have been a bit scary. 

And, all the ceramic parts made by Spode would have had to be fired in the bottle ovens several times for each stage of manufacture: biscuit firing, glost firing, firing for each colour painted in stages and after the gilding and then the gold burnished by hand. They would also have to be exactly the right size. This is no mean feat and is what I really admire - Josiah Spode II at the forefront of ceramic technology.
Plate painted with Spode factory and its bottle ovens (detail)

The pieces passed through many hands from preparation of raw materials through to the finished pieces. 

Here are a few: mould makers and pressers, slab makers, makers of the moulded parts, the thrower and turners, glaze makers and dippers,**** hand painters, gilders and burnishers, the placers and, one of the most important men on the factory, the fireman. And don't forget clerks, bookkeepers, design, record keeping, accountants, packers and transport... 

I am sure there is more to say about these lamps and one day I hope I will be able to see them 'in the flesh'.

Look out for part 2 of this series of mine of 'how to big up your pots'... where you will discover more of Spode's skills and the extravagance and the wonder Brighton Pavilion... from a ceramic point of view.

_________________
Acknowledgments and notes:

Taken from my lecture 'The Josiah Spodes: Pottery Pioneers'

* Benjamin Lewis Vulliamy (1780–1854), succeeded his father as head of the firm and Clockmaker to the King. Although his formal education is unknown, he evidently received a thorough training in both the theoretical and practical aspects of the business. By 1800 he was already helping to run the firm and after he became a partner in 1801 his involvement rapidly increased, so there was little immediate change in the firm's direction when he took over in 1811. 

**Many thanks to Robert Copeland (1925-2010) who sparked my interest in and researched, wrote about this subject and shared his knowledge with me. In particular his article 'Jars for the King', published in the Spode Society's 'Recorder'.

***The New Pocket Cyclopædia contains a report of the Prince's visit to Spode in 1806.


**** Terry Woolliscroft's Potbank Dictionary for explanation of words associated with the Pottery Industry.

Thanks to Pat Halfpenny with whom I swapped notes images, information and enthusiasm about this subject.

Royal Pavilion history - click HERE

Royal Pavilion objects in the Royal Collection Trust - click HERE>

HM King George IV (1762-1830): Regent (1811-1820); King (1820-1830)
HM King George IV by Thomas Lawrence

Spode & the Royal Pavilion (Part 2): Porcelain Pagodas

$
0
0
This blogpost follows 'Spode & the Royal Pavilion (Part I): Oil Lamps & an Old Chinese Vase' which has my information on the background and introduction to the main players in this story. For more click here>
Antique Chinese Porcelain Pagodas.
Impressive... but are they really big enough?
Chinese porcelain pagodas seem to have been something of 'A Thing' in the early 1800s and several, some in sets, are in the Royal Collections (RCT). I confess to getting a bit confused early on in this research with so many similar porcelain pagodas!

In the top photo*** you can see 4 magnificent 518cm (17ft) high pagodas in situ at the Royal Pavilion, Brighton which was 'the seaside pleasure palace for HM King George IV'. They are also described by RCT as 'colossal Chinese towers' which I rather like. And they use the word 'pyramid' for other pagodas in their collections too. 
Pagoda 17ft high (RCT no.RCIN1)
To make the original pagodas, which were already pretty impressive, even taller and to fit in with the scale of rooms in the Royal Pavilion, bases were added. The 'blue scagliola double plinths' were by Henry Westmacott. Josiah Spode II (Potter to the King) was commissioned to make the 'Chinese' landscape panels for the main part of the new bases. These beautiful panels are decorated with transfer printed borders in a blue fretwork pattern which surrounds the handpainted Chinese scenes. They show the great technical skill of Spode's early 19th century ceramic manufacture. The gilded metal work was by Benjamin Vulliamy*. 
Detail of Spode panels for the base
Spode's ceramic panels are likely to have been made from their stone china body which was developed to imitate, and match, Chinese porcelain in look, feel and quality. It was in production by 1812 but the exact date of introduction is unknown. Certainly some of the other pagodas in the Royal Pavilion have bases which are marked with the Stone China backstamp (mark) which is in the style of a pseudo-Chinese seal.
Backstamp used on another set of pagodas (RCT no.RCIN2400)
Together with this set of four pagodas, two more pairs are in the RCT (RCIN812 and RCIN 2400) and were installed at the Royal Pavilion. These also had ceramic base panels made by Spode. The two other pairs of Chinese porcelain pagodas were of different designs and had different panels made by Spode for their bases.
Detail of Spode panels made for the base (RCT no.RCIN2400)

Pagoda, bottom 2 tiers by Spode (RCT no.RCIN812)

All these pagodas can be viewed in detail on the RCT website.**

Here you can also find other Spode items, as well as those made at a later date when the company was owned by the Copeland family, which are in the RCT. To view them use the link at the end of this post. Then use the search option and search on Spode, select the tab 'What' to find the details of the various Spode objects including the pagoda sets. Unfortunately it is not possible to link directly to the Spode pagodas.

If you would like to marvel at the skill of how to put a pagoda together from all its component parts, please click Assembling a Pagoda and page down to watch a time-lapse film which is great fun. 
_________________
Acknowledgments and notes:

Taken from my lecture 'The Josiah Spodes: Pottery Pioneers'

Thanks to Robert Copeland (1925-2010) who sparked my interest in and researched and wrote about this subject sharing his knowledge with me. In particular his article 'Jars for the King', published in the Spode Society's 'Recorder'. More about the 'Jars' will appear in the next instalment.

* Benjamin Lewis Vulliamy (1780–1854), succeeded his father as head of the firm and Clockmaker to the King. Although his formal education is unknown, he evidently received a thorough training in both the theoretical and practical aspects of the business. By 1800 he was already helping to run the firm and after he became a partner in 1801 his involvement rapidly increased, so there was little immediate change in the firm's direction when he took over in 1811. 

The New Pocket Cyclopædia contains a report of the Prince's visit to Spode in 1806.

Terry Woolliscroft's Potbank Dictionary for explanation of words associated with the Pottery Industry.

Thanks to Pat Halfpenny with whom I swapped notes images, information and enthusiasm about this subject.

Royal Pavilion history - click HERE

**Royal Pavilion objects in the Royal Collection Trust (RCT) - click HERE>
***Thank you to Patricia Ferguson for the photo showing pagodas in situ at the Royal Pavilion. Patricia is on Instagram: @vasemadness 

HM King George IV (1762-1830): Regent (1811-1820); King (1820-1830)
HM King George IV by Thomas Lawrence

Spode & the Royal Pavilion (Part 3): Jars for the King

$
0
0

'Jars for the King'
This blogpost follows 'Spode & the Royal Pavilion...' (Part 1 & Part 2). In the final part of this mini-series, I am paying homage to my colleague and Spode mentor Robert Copeland (1925-2010). Much of what follows is from his research* which is how I became interested in Spode's Royal Pavilion connections in the first place. I also love that his huge knowledge and experience of ceramic technology helped to unravel some of the mystery of the making of these jars.

The top image shows 'The Banqueting Room at the Royal Pavilion'** in 1826. You need to peer carefully to see the Spode connection! The rich blue and very tall oil-fuelled torchères, or standard lamps, down each side of the Banqueting Room had large components made by Spode. I'll help you out below, with a close up of 4 of the 8 made***
Four of the torchères
The above image shows detail from Nash's illustration giving a feel of the size of the torchères. Compare the men standing by them.
Spode's making record of the Jars (detail) and how they fit in the torchères
Jar is an old word for vase. In this case a 'jar' was a fundamental part of the each torchère. The image above shows the 'Upright Jar' with some of its making instructions from a shape book of c1820. Another document records that the jars were made in April 1818.

The shape book includes the note 'this jar is thrown in 4 parts'. **** The measurements you can see are instructions for the thrower. Also included were measurements for the turner, which were smaller, and the finished article would be smaller still after shrinkage in firing. All were carefully calculated by those expert potters. The record also notes that the jars were made from Spode's stone china.***** 

Robert Copeland explained that:
    'Down one side of the room [Banqueting  Room] the torchères were fitted into long side tables, whilst on the window side of the room they were free-standing; these were further embellished with carved and gilt wood dolphins at the base. These torchères consist of circular drums of wood carrying tall jars richly mounted in ormolu borders, top and bottoms with dragon handles, the tails supporting a ground glass painted lotus; the lamps are 9ft 9in high [approx. 300cm]. The jars and the drums are royal blue in colour and it is about the jars that I [Copeland] am interested because they were made by Spode, who not only held the Prince's Warrant but was also regarded as one of the leading porcelain manufacturers in Europe at the time.
    ...visitors to the Royal Pavilion may be overawed by the magnificence of the Banqueting Room and its extraordinary decoration. They may note the unusual lamps. But a potter will marvel not only at the size of the jars, which are 36 inches [approx. 91.5cm] tall, but especially at the evenness of blue over the whole surface. Cobalt blue tends to 'run' in the glaze and it is exceptionally difficult to apply evenly by hand-held brush. Ground-laying was the method which would have been the most likely to yield an even distribution but how did Josiah Spode II's craftsmen solve the problem?'

Following a chance find at Spode of a copper [plate] 'stipple punched all over, i.e. covered neatly with dots' ******, Copeland was curious as to its use. As he remarked it would have made a very dull pattern! It reminded him of a 'sheet pattern' and the closest I can find of something similarly dull is an engraved apprentice copper.
Apprentice copper plate (detail)
In his article Copeland states that he later found a reference in an old recipe book.
It reads:
Blue for Printing the upright
Jars 36in made Apl 1818
for the King
3 Banding Blue & 2 White Lead
for the first time over, when
Hardened printed again with
Common Blue

Many, many different blues******* were used at Spode

Copeland continued:
     'I believe that the stipple sheet copper was used to apply an even coating of blue to these great jars. The formula for Banding Blue was: 10lb Best Blue Calx, 2lb Flint Glass. Banding Blue was for the blue bands [on a pot] normally applied by pencil - the potters' name for a brush. This blue was also used for groundlaying. After transferring the stipple sheet the jars were hardened on in a kiln at about 650ᵒC. This firing was to fasten the colour to the pot.
    Then they were printed again with Common Blue (10lb of Blue Calx, 18lb Cornwall Stone), when the transfer paper could be placed over any joins which showed from the first printing. They [the jars] would have to be hardened on again before the glaze was applied and then fired at about 1050ᵒC to develop the rich blue colour of Cobalt silicate.
    After this some gilded ornamentation was added at the base to link up with the ormolu mounts. This gilding would require a decorating kiln fire of about 720ᵒC followed by burnishing to render the gold shiny'.
Burnishing tools can be seen at Staffordshire Past Track
For clarification, the 1050ᵒC firing was the glost firing. In total, the jars had at least 5 firings - biscuit, 2 hardening on, glost and decorating kiln - all it bottle ovens].+
Spode factory and bottle ovens c1800
Copeland then goes on to discuss the making of the jars:
    'The shaping of the jars was by throwing in four parts which were then joined carefully by the thrower; later they were turned and, because of their great size, I suppose they would have been turned in an upright position [the norm would have been to turn objects in a horizontal position - see image below]. The exact measurements to be observed by the thrower and the turner are recorded in two Shape Books. One of these gives turner's measurements for two different bodies, one of which is marked S China [Stone China]'.
Turning a cup at Spode c1975
Other parts of the torchères were made by other craftsmen including by Vulliamy who also worked on the oil lamps and pagodas mentioned in my previous two posts.

These, then, are just some of the items made for the Royal Pavilion by Spode. Copeland mentions that Spode also supplied '4 oval blue china vases for celerets'. These measured approx. 82cm wide by 56cm high and 56cm across. They were ordered on 5th Jan 1822 according to Copeland citing The Royal Pavilion Requisitions Book. 
'Oval blue china vase for celerets'
Copeland also mentions Spode panels with painted flowers on an Imperial yellow ground set into wooden pedestals on which Chinese figures holding banners stood.
Spode ceramic panels in wooden base
____________________
Acknowledgments and notes:

Taken from my lecture 'The Josiah Spodes: Pottery Pioneers'

*My huge thanks to Robert Copeland (1925-2010) who sparked my interest in and researched and wrote about this subject sharing his knowledge with me. In particular his work on this subject around the 1970s/1980s, culminating in his article 'Jars for the King', published in the Spode Society's 'Recorder'. Although a member of the family who owned Spode, Copeland served 3 years 'at the bench' gaining experience of all the processes of ceramic manufacture on the factory floor. Later this gave him an advantage as a ceramic historian to understand the techniques of pottery production. I continue to be deeply grateful to Copeland who generously shared his Spode researches with me. We often did a swap and amalgamation of finds! He would be thrilled, I know, to be a part of the blogosphere. See below for a selection of his publications and also look at my booklist HERE>

In his article Copeland gives his thanks to Jessica Rutherford, then Principal Keeper at the Royal Pavilion. His references include:

'The Making of the Royal Pavilion, Brighton Designs and Drawings' by J. Morley, Sotheby, 1984

'The Royal Pavilion, Brighton' by John Dinkel, Philip Wilson 1983

** 'The Banqueting Room at the Royal Pavilion' from John Nash's Views of the Royal Pavilion 1826

*** @BrightonMuseums on Twitter; @brighton_museums on Instagram

****The majority of the pieces in the Spode shape books of this period are for items solely made by throwing and in bone china. So when there is an exception to this a note is usually included. The technical details included are for the Thrower (measurements on the left-hand page) and for the Turner (measurements on the right-hand page). Shape books can be seen online at Spode Exhibition Online.

***** More on the previous blogpost - click here

****** Pattern decoration could be applied by transfer printing method using hand engraved copper plates. The copper plates were simply referred to as coppers at the Spode factory.

******* For more on ceramic blues see: 'Spode's Willow Pattern & Other designs after the Chinese' 3rd edition, by Robert Copeland, Studio Vista, 1999 ISBN 0 289 80177-X Opposite page 70.

Other indispensable books by Robert Copeland: 

'Manufacturing Processes of Tableware during the Eighteenth & Nineteenth Centuries', Northern Ceramic Society, 2009 ISBN 978-0-9563159-0-8 [Much is illustrated from his photographs at Spode]

'Spode & Copeland Marks & Other Relevant Intelligence', Studio Vista, 2nd edition 1997 ISBN 0 289 80069 2

'Parian: Copeland's Statuary Porcelain', Antique Collectors' Club, 2007 ISBN 10: 1 85149 499 5, ISBN 13: 1 85149 499 6

The New Pocket Cyclopædia contains a report of the Prince's visit to Spode in 1806.


+ Please see Terry Woolliscroft's Potbank Dictionary for explanation of words associated with the Pottery Industry.

Thanks to Pat Halfpenny with whom I swapped notes, images, information and enthusiasm about this subject.

Royal Pavilion history - click HERE

Royal Pavilion objects in the Royal Collection Trust (RCT) - click HERE>


HM King George IV (1762-1830): Regent (1811-1820); King (1820-1830)
HM King George IV by Thomas Lawrence

Stoke's Ceramic Museums under Threat

$
0
0

Forgive me, this is not my usual style of post... but my passion for pots & museums drives me to write this.

Stoke-on-Trent City Council is deleting ALL the posts at the multi-award winning Gladstone Pottery Museum

At the Potteries Museum & Art Gallery - acknowledged as 'the finest collection of Staffordshire ceramics in the world' - BOTH Ceramics Curator posts are being deleted.

***Potteries Museum & Art Gallery

Here are links if you want to get involved...

There is also a lot going on in support of the staff and the museums on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

1.The PETITION: click UKChange if you would like to sign. At the time of writing (13 January 2022) nearly 20,000 people have signed the petition against the proposals. 

2.EMAIL ADDRESS for Stoke-on-Trent City Council if you would like to make a direct comment by email budgetconsultation@stoke.gov.uk 

3.COMMENT FORM for comments on the Budget 2022/2023 of Stoke-on-Trent City Council - click here>  First you will see that the top of the page currently displays 'Beat the Cold' but page down for the relevant section to fill in the form for your thoughts on the proposals. If you wish to read the budget document click here> and download Budget Book 2022/2023 as a pdf to open in your pdf reader (where it should be easier to search rather than opening online). Page 19 is particularly relevant.

For context, I have worked in 4 of Stoke-on-Trent's museums, in curatorial roles, at Gladstone Pottery Museum, Spode Museum, Ford Green Hall and Chatterley Whitfield Mining Museum. For more click here>

Now here are some of my thoughts and comments:

***Potteries Museum & Art Gallery

Decades of expertise in ceramics will be lost. 

Internationally important collections will be under threat.

Care, documentation and knowledge will be at risk.

Access will be limited.

Grants will be more difficult to get as Museum Accreditation may be under threat therefore limiting access to funding and other support.

Important national and international touring exhibitions which bring in admission income as well as visitors may not happen if specialist curators are not in place.

***Potteries Museum & Art Gallery
I am bewildered... these internationally important and award-winning museums are why people from all over the world come to Stoke. 

Stoke-on-Trent only exists because of its centuries old pottery industry. It has a unique heritage. It supplied the world. It deserves BOTH its different but complimentary pottery museums. 

Today's pottery manufacturers still choose to be based in Stoke.

Studio potters have their studios here.

Clay College is here.

Ceramic raw material suppliers are based here.

Past and future thrive and work together here. 

Council cuts may need to be made but this plan is clearly unimaginative. Targeting ceramics specifically, the very soul of the City, seems decidedly odd. Is it possible this is a weird vendetta against pots for some personal reason? There seems to be a big gap in understanding and logic. 

I understand that this is Councillor(s) driven. But consider. What do they drink from, eat from, use in the bathroom, see in their favourite films, watch on TV, walk on, live in... ceramics from the unique Stoke-on-Trent, The Potteries, from teapots to toilets to tiles.

***Gladstone Pottery Museum

***Gladstone Pottery Museum

***Gladstone Pottery Museum

***Gladstone Pottery Museum

Feel free to share any of my text, links and images as you wish.
___________________

*** I have purposely left the captions off images to emphasise the point that we would not know the detail of what they represent without the curators and researchers and conservators and interpreters and volunteers who have specialist expertise and dedication to their roles at these museums, built up over decades.

Written on request of Gladstone Pottery Museum as a volunteer project 2018

Spode, January and Winter

$
0
0
This beautiful printed tile, dating from the late 1800s, depicts January from a set of twelve designs representing the months of the year.

I have blogged about it before and you can find details here: Spode in January
'Seasons' pattern, design for Winter
Another pattern tying in with this time of year is 'Seasons', first recorded in about 1837. At this time the company was known as Copeland & Garrett. There are different versions of the pattern and it is also called 'Italian Garden' and there is a version called 'Seasons Star'. The central design for Winter features ice skaters in front of The Kremlin behind a large vase, inscribed 'Winter', full of tumbling flowers & foliage.

The 'Seasons' name refers as much to the border of the pattern which depicts four cherubs, representing Spring, Summer, Autumn and Winter, as to the centres, which are sometimes named with a month or season.
Detail of border design depicting cherubs
'Italian Garden', backstamp c1842
Footbath, Seasons Star printed in green (from Worthpoint)
Footbath (detail), Seasons Star printed in green (from Worthpoint)
You can find more black & white images of 'Seasons' pattern HERE>
Viewing all 87 articles
Browse latest View live